I serve as a statewide expert witness in probate and trust litigation involving the characterization of community and separate property under California law. My work assists probate courts and litigators in resolving disputes where ownership cannot be determined by title alone.
Too often, probate and trust cases begin—and end—with a simplistic title analysis. California law requires far more.
California is a community property state. Ownership depends on when and how an asset was acquired, how it was maintained, and whether community labor or funds contributed to its growth—not merely whose name appears on title.
In probate and trust litigation, failure to conduct a proper community property analysis risks:
I provide expert analysis grounded in family law principles applied within probate and trust frameworks.
Assets titled in one spouse’s name alone may nevertheless be partially—or entirely—community property.
The community may acquire a pro tanto ownership interest through:
In some cases, the community’s interest may approach or reach 100% of the asset, despite separate title.
Retirement assets are among the most frequently misunderstood categories in probate litigation.
Under California law:
Failure to properly analyze retirement accounts can dramatically distort estate distributions.
Real property disputes often involve:
A correct analysis requires tracing, valuation, and application of established community property doctrines—not assumptions based on record title.
Businesses and professional practices present unique challenges in probate and trust litigation.
Even where a business predates marriage, community labor, skill, and effort may transform post-marital growth into community property. These issues frequently arise in:
I provide expert analysis grounded in family law principles applied within probate and trust frameworks.
California probate law expressly incorporates community property principles.
A decedent may dispose of one-half of the community property and all separate property by will or trust.
Intestate succession depends on whether property is community or separate—making characterization a threshold issue. Without first determining property character, probate statutes cannot be properly applied.
I served as trial and appellate counsel in Wilkin v. Nelson (2020), a case with lasting implications for probate and trust practice.
The courts held that the drafting attorney failed to meet the standard of care by not adequately explaining community and separate property consequences to the decedent—seventeen years earlier.
Probate expert Don Cheadle testified on probate-specific issues and has written extensively about the case’s impact. The decision reinforces a critical principle: community property analysis is essential in estate planning and probate litigation.
My qualifications include:
My expertise bridges family law, probate, trust administration, and professional standards of care.
I am available statewide as: